In a blog post earlier this month, Mark Brinkley wrote that the zero carbon agenda is dependent on private wire networks, which he contends are anti-competitive. While I have a lot of respect for Mark, in this case his arguments aren’t valid. Here’s why.
Archive for January, 2009
zero carbon must not depend on private wires
Posted in Code for Sustainable Homes, private wire, renewable energy, SAP, zero carbon on January 19, 2009 | 8 Comments »
sadly, another nail in the coffin for small wind
Posted in energy, engineering, renewable energy, wind turbines, tagged BWEA, Encraft, micro-wind, small wind turbines on January 14, 2009 | 3 Comments »
According to the Guardian, most domestic turbines are only generating 5-10% of the manufacturers’ claims. Dramatic stuff but maybe not a huge surprise. I think there’s been a growing realisation among professionals in the built environment that small wind in built up areas rarely works. But it’s important to remember that in most cases this [...]
zcc IV: what does 70% mean?
Posted in climate change, Code for Sustainable Homes, renewable energy, sustainability, zero carbon, tagged zero carbon consultation on January 9, 2009 | 1 Comment »
CLG drop quite a few hints in the zero carbon consultation that they’re prepared to set the carbon compliance requirement at 70%. In other words, new schemes would have to achieve a reduction of 70% in regulated emissions relative to 2006 regulations. But if you look a little closer, it soon becomes clear that this [...]
zcc III: onsite, offsite, and the role of private wires
Posted in biomass, chp, Code for Sustainable Homes, energy, engineering, private wire, renewable energy, SAP, sustainability, wind turbines, zero carbon, tagged zero carbon consultation on January 8, 2009 | 2 Comments »
From the zero carbon consultation, you can see that CLG has accepted that we need to resolve the onsite / offsite question. They have also moved away from the requirement for private wire networks or “direct connections” between generators and homes since it caused all sorts of problems. So positive moves from CLG, but there [...]