<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: zero carbon consultation II: summary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carbonlimited.org/2008/12/30/zero-carbon-consultation-ii-summary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carbonlimited.org/2008/12/30/zero-carbon-consultation-ii-summary/</link>
	<description>low carbon energy and engineering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 23:14:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zcc III: onsite, offsite, and the role of private wires &#171; carbon limited</title>
		<link>http://carbonlimited.org/2008/12/30/zero-carbon-consultation-ii-summary/#comment-789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zcc III: onsite, offsite, and the role of private wires &#171; carbon limited]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carbonlimited.org/?p=428#comment-789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] towards carbon compliance, while offsite energy is only likely to count as an allowable solution. See here for definitions. It&#8217;s also likely that allowable solutions will include a whole range of possible measures, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] towards carbon compliance, while offsite energy is only likely to count as an allowable solution. See here for definitions. It&#8217;s also likely that allowable solutions will include a whole range of possible measures, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fairsnape</title>
		<link>http://carbonlimited.org/2008/12/30/zero-carbon-consultation-ii-summary/#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fairsnape]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carbonlimited.org/?p=428#comment-787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great item Casey and in full support of a call to arms on this one. I have picked up on this with a similar post on my blog.

I fear the mainstream industry (construction) will let this this pass by thinking it has nothing to do with them ....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great item Casey and in full support of a call to arms on this one. I have picked up on this with a similar post on my blog.</p>
<p>I fear the mainstream industry (construction) will let this this pass by thinking it has nothing to do with them &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Clark</title>
		<link>http://carbonlimited.org/2008/12/30/zero-carbon-consultation-ii-summary/#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Clark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carbonlimited.org/?p=428#comment-786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good work Casey. So a healthy dose of reality as we enter 2009. Agreed on the need for a new SAP.
 I&#039;ll be interested to hear your thoughts on MVHR - is this because they&#039;re essentially useless unless the fabric itself is sound?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work Casey. So a healthy dose of reality as we enter 2009. Agreed on the need for a new SAP.<br />
 I&#8217;ll be interested to hear your thoughts on MVHR &#8211; is this because they&#8217;re essentially useless unless the fabric itself is sound?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

