<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Communal Wind Turbines and SAP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carbonlimited.org/2008/03/14/communal-wind-turbines-and-sap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carbonlimited.org/2008/03/14/communal-wind-turbines-and-sap/</link>
	<description>low carbon energy and engineering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 07:31:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zcc III: onsite, offsite, and the role of private wires &#171; carbon limited</title>
		<link>http://carbonlimited.org/2008/03/14/communal-wind-turbines-and-sap/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zcc III: onsite, offsite, and the role of private wires &#171; carbon limited]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carbonlimited.wordpress.com/?p=246#comment-790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] issue here by claiming that SAP already resolves it, but SAP doesn&#8217;t! For example, under SAP you cannot use a communal wind turbine regardless of whether it&#8217;s directly connected to dwellings or [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] issue here by claiming that SAP already resolves it, but SAP doesn&#8217;t! For example, under SAP you cannot use a communal wind turbine regardless of whether it&#8217;s directly connected to dwellings or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mel starrs</title>
		<link>http://carbonlimited.org/2008/03/14/communal-wind-turbines-and-sap/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mel starrs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carbonlimited.wordpress.com/?p=246#comment-545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rubbish, frighteneing and not that surprising, I&#039;m afraid.

Yay for blogging though - do you think you would have got the same swift response 5 years ago?  I suspect not.  Some letters may have been written which no-one would have read.  At least now stuff seems to be getting done.  Or is my heady optimism premature...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rubbish, frighteneing and not that surprising, I&#8217;m afraid.</p>
<p>Yay for blogging though &#8211; do you think you would have got the same swift response 5 years ago?  I suspect not.  Some letters may have been written which no-one would have read.  At least now stuff seems to be getting done.  Or is my heady optimism premature&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey</title>
		<link>http://carbonlimited.org/2008/03/14/communal-wind-turbines-and-sap/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carbonlimited.wordpress.com/?p=246#comment-544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fact that no-one was aware of the implications of this policy is either rubbish or frightening. Actually it&#039;s frightening either way.

Great work Nick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that no-one was aware of the implications of this policy is either rubbish or frightening. Actually it&#8217;s frightening either way.</p>
<p>Great work Nick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

