<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: without action, the plan for zero carbon homes by 2016 will fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carbonlimited.org/2008/01/03/without-action-the-plan-for-zero-carbon-homes-by-2016-will-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carbonlimited.org/2008/01/03/without-action-the-plan-for-zero-carbon-homes-by-2016-will-fail/</link>
	<description>low carbon energy and engineering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 23:14:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Briggs</title>
		<link>http://carbonlimited.org/2008/01/03/without-action-the-plan-for-zero-carbon-homes-by-2016-will-fail/#comment-612</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Briggs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carbonlimited.wordpress.com/2008/01/03/without-action-the-plan-for-zero-carbon-homes-by-2016-will-fail/#comment-612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right, this does need to be taken seriously now. The focus also needs widening beyond technical solutions to include issues such as training, attitudes, and culture. Failure to address these softer issues is already causing problems even with the current much less stringent standards. This is illustrated in further detail in an article on my Web site at http://www.mikebriggs.org/rsph, which may be of interest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, this does need to be taken seriously now. The focus also needs widening beyond technical solutions to include issues such as training, attitudes, and culture. Failure to address these softer issues is already causing problems even with the current much less stringent standards. This is illustrated in further detail in an article on my Web site at <a href="http://www.mikebriggs.org/rsph" rel="nofollow">http://www.mikebriggs.org/rsph</a>, which may be of interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hanham Hall &#171; isite</title>
		<link>http://carbonlimited.org/2008/01/03/without-action-the-plan-for-zero-carbon-homes-by-2016-will-fail/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hanham Hall &#171; isite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carbonlimited.wordpress.com/2008/01/03/without-action-the-plan-for-zero-carbon-homes-by-2016-will-fail/#comment-546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] projects, the designs are based on the Chorley homes technology - so I hope the comments made by CarbonLimited are taken into [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] projects, the designs are based on the Chorley homes technology &#8211; so I hope the comments made by CarbonLimited are taken into [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barrat Homes - Chorley &#171; isite</title>
		<link>http://carbonlimited.org/2008/01/03/without-action-the-plan-for-zero-carbon-homes-by-2016-will-fail/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barrat Homes - Chorley &#171; isite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carbonlimited.wordpress.com/2008/01/03/without-action-the-plan-for-zero-carbon-homes-by-2016-will-fail/#comment-481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] CarbonLimited - scathing comments on performance [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CarbonLimited &#8211; scathing comments on performance [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whats wrong with Code level 6 - a more informed view&#8230; &#171; isite</title>
		<link>http://carbonlimited.org/2008/01/03/without-action-the-plan-for-zero-carbon-homes-by-2016-will-fail/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Whats wrong with Code level 6 - a more informed view&#8230; &#171; isite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carbonlimited.wordpress.com/2008/01/03/without-action-the-plan-for-zero-carbon-homes-by-2016-will-fail/#comment-451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 7, 2008 &#183; No Comments  CarbonLimited have posted a more informed and detailed view on whats wrong with the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 7, 2008 &middot; No Comments  CarbonLimited have posted a more informed and detailed view on whats wrong with the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Del.icio.us.ness for January 3rd</title>
		<link>http://carbonlimited.org/2008/01/03/without-action-the-plan-for-zero-carbon-homes-by-2016-will-fail/#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Del.icio.us.ness for January 3rd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carbonlimited.wordpress.com/2008/01/03/without-action-the-plan-for-zero-carbon-homes-by-2016-will-fail/#comment-443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Without action, 2016 will fail - Excellent article from Casey, picks up both Martin and Mark&#8217;s points re: CSH [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Without action, 2016 will fail &#8211; Excellent article from Casey, picks up both Martin and Mark&#8217;s points re: CSH [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

