<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comment&#252;s on: Carbon Trust micro CHP interim report finally out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carbonlimited.org/2007/11/27/carbon-trust-micro-chp-interim-report-finally-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carbonlimited.org/2007/11/27/carbon-trust-micro-chp-interim-report-finally-out/</link>
	<description>low carbon energy and engineering</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: emissions from CHP: the standard method is wrong &#171; carbon limited</title>
		<link>http://carbonlimited.org/2007/11/27/carbon-trust-micro-chp-interim-report-finally-out/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>emissions from CHP: the standard method is wrong &#171; carbon limited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carbonlimited.wordpress.com/2007/11/27/carbon-trust-micro-chp-interim-report-finally-out/#comment-514</guid>
		<description>[...] The nascent micro-CHP industry (expected to be worth £2billion per year across Europe) is using this flawed method to back up its sustainability claims. Changing from a commonsense approach to the much more forgiving &#8220;standard&#8221; approach explains why the first Carbon Trust interim report on the micro-CHP field trails was so bleak and the second was so rosy.    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The nascent micro-CHP industry (expected to be worth £2billion per year across Europe) is using this flawed method to back up its sustainability claims. Changing from a commonsense approach to the much more forgiving &#8220;standard&#8221; approach explains why the first Carbon Trust interim report on the micro-CHP field trails was so bleak and the second was so rosy.    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
